Really compelling framework here. The Weber ideal type lens is clever because it shows how structure doesnt just redistribute authority, it actually redefines what effectiveness looks like. I've seen CIOs fail under the CFO/COO because they kept pushing for strategic visibility instead of building operational credibility first. The blind spot taxonomy for each model is super practical advice people dunno how much context shapes success.
I love this. What would you say to an aspiring CIO who has only worked under 1 type (ie COO of large school and COO of large admin division, respectively)?
I think when you parlay your experience into the next opportunity the ideal type I've suggested can help you think about how the role is different depending on who it reports too. Thanks for the comment.
Really compelling framework here. The Weber ideal type lens is clever because it shows how structure doesnt just redistribute authority, it actually redefines what effectiveness looks like. I've seen CIOs fail under the CFO/COO because they kept pushing for strategic visibility instead of building operational credibility first. The blind spot taxonomy for each model is super practical advice people dunno how much context shapes success.
I love this. What would you say to an aspiring CIO who has only worked under 1 type (ie COO of large school and COO of large admin division, respectively)?
I think when you parlay your experience into the next opportunity the ideal type I've suggested can help you think about how the role is different depending on who it reports too. Thanks for the comment.